Matt Kuhar vs Alafia Ayeni Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Nov at 06:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Kuhar vs A. Ayeni

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kuhar 1 - 0 Ayeni
They have played 3 sets in total, with Matt Kuhar winning 2 and Alafia Ayeni winning 1. The last match between Matt Kuhar and Alafia Ayeni was at the Drummondville Challenger, 09-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Matt Kuhar getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-2 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kuhar | 1 |
| Ayeni | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Drummondville Challenger(11-09-25)
M. Kuhar vs A. Ayeni H2H Profile
M. Kuhar vs A. Ayeni Match Preview:
- Alafia Ayeni's second serve performance is currently at 46.89%, which is slightly better than Matt Kuhar's 42.53%. How does this affect match predictions? It usually suggests an edge for Ayeni.
- In return games, Kuhar has outperformed Ayeni in recent months, capturing 47.70% of opponents' second serve points compared to Ayeni's 45.61%.
- Matt Kuhar also excels in first serve returns, winning 30.62%, whereas Alafia Ayeni has managed 27.42%.
- Ayeni has shown stronger mental resilience, saving 51.15% of breakpoints compared to Kuhar's 44.97%.
- Looking at match outcomes over the past year, Matt Kuhar narrowly leads with a win percentage of 49.02% against Ayeni's 47.73%.
- Which surface benefits each player? Both demonstrate proficiency with a 55% win rate on hard or indoor hard surfaces.
- Ayeni and Kuhar have both competed largely in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Ayeni winning a slightly higher percentage of matches (53.33%) than Kuhar (50.00%).
- Kuhar's opponents have had a higher average rank (428.1) compared to those faced by Ayeni (484.75), indicating tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Kuhar has a notable edge with a 40% win rate over Ayeni's 17% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (November 9, 2025, UTC):
Based on second serve performance, Alafia Ayeni has a slight statistical advantage. His ability to save breakpoints could be crucial in maintaining momentum during the match.
Despite Ayeni's strengths, Matt Kuhar's superior performance in return games, particularly against first serves, may provide him with more opportunities to break serve. Additionally, Kuhar's higher level of competition faced over the last year could equip him with better match preparation.
If the match extends to a deciding set, Kuhar’s stronger record suggests he may have the stamina and mental toughness to seize the win. Consistently emerging victorious in such situations demonstrates Kuhar's potential to handle pressure effectively.
Therefore, taking all factors into consideration, Matt Kuhar is favored to be the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Matt Kuhar vs Alafia Ayeni Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Kuhar vs A. Ayeni H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:42:32 | Average Match Time | 1:42:32 |
| 63% (40/63) | 1st Serve % | 66% (57/87) |
| 75% (30/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (33/57) |
| 65% (15/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 47% (41/87) | Return Points Win % | 29% (18/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Kuhar Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-7(6) 6-2 3-0 ret. | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
A. Ayeni Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-7(6) 6-2 3-0 ret. | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 4-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | ||

M. Kuhar vs A. Ayeni Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.44% (107/86) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.31% (196/186) |
| 55.17% (240/195) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.26% (446/424) |
| 52.87% (2126/1895) | Games Win/Loss | 50.74% (4226/4102) |
| 57.34% (82/61) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.82% (128/119) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.94% (23/26) |
| 53.33% (16/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.09% (43/38) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 340 | Aces Total | 1598 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 425 | Total Double Faults | 1499 |
| 1:6:23 | Average Match Time | 1:12:58 |
| 405.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 219.1 |
| 63% (4950/7838) | 1st Serve % | 61% (12302/20155) |
| 65% (3200/4950) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (8532/12302) |
| 47% (1346/2888) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3536/7853) |
| 45% (341/756) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (749/1842) |
| 40% (3201/7935) | Return Points Win % | 38% (7487/19483) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Challenger W/L | 44.59% (66/82) |
| 56.67% (102/78) | Futures W/L | 56.28% (130/101) |
| 55% (105/191) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (189/372) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 49% (17/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (57/116) |
| 45% (21/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (52/110) |
| 91% (109/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (198/168) |
| 9% (109/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (198/28) |
| 10% (84/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (184/27) |